Here We Go Again: GPS All Set to Win Sarawak Election

Compiled by Poltracker

Compiled by Poltracker

Covid-19 pandemic and the declaration of Emergency on 12 January have cooled off talks of a snap poll at the national level but not quite in the case of Sarawak.

On 22 January, it was reported that the Sarawak government plans to appeal to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong to lift the emergency order in the state if it can bring the Covid-19 situation to a manageable level. This would then pave way for the state election.

The present state government has a mandate until June while the Emergency order is expected to be in force until 1 August. An election must be held within 60 days of the expiration of the mandate or dissolution of the state assembly. The Emergency (Essential Powers) Ordinance 2021 among others stipulated that general elections, state elections and by-elections, as well as Parliament and State Legislative Assembly sittings, will not be held as long as the emergency is in force.

Sarawak has had good control of the spread of the pandemic with tight border controls and mandatory quarantine of 14 days upon arrival, thereby keeping its cases low. However, in the past month, there has been a surge in cases which have since spread to the longhouses and interior part of the state. Presently at daily three-digit high, it would take some weeks to bring down the numbers again.

A total of 82 state seats are up for grabs at the 12th state election. Gabungan Party Sarawak (GPS) has control of the state with 68 seats. GPS was created post 2018 general election where the Sarawak-based parties withdrew from Barisan Nasional (BN) but remained friendly to them. The opposition bloc has the remaining 14 seats.

GPS, led by Chief Minister Datuk Patinggi Abang Johari Openg who took over the state leadership after the demise of the late Tan Sri Adenan Satem in 2017, has been dishing out aids to the people and businesses since the onset of the pandemic.

To date, its Bantuan Khas Sarawakku Sayang (BKSS) has spent almost RM3 billion to mitigate the impact of Covid-19. The relief from BKSS has been well received and will to a certain extent help to shore up support for GPS which will bode well for the coming election.

The pandemic has also resulted in the state tightening its entry rules. In October last year, the state announced that all election workers and campaigners from outside Sarawak must obtain a work permit from the state Immigration Department before they are allowed entry in the event of a state election. This, to a certain extent, would put a spanner in the opposition machinery. 

The opposition front especially Democratic Action Party (DAP) had in past elections relied on many out of state campaign workers which include polling and counting agents. The outsiders were known to be more vocal and assertive when dealing with issues especially at the polling and counting centres as compared to local election workers, a fact that did not escape Deputy Chief Minister Datuk Amar Douglas Uggah.

Uggah warned Sarawakians that campaign workers from the peninsula are known for their more aggressive or robust behaviour.

Let us not be cowed by them nor should we imitate them,” he said when announced the work permit requirement.

While there is a movement to take Sarawak out from Malaysia, it is not expected to make any headway for now. Bread and butter for the ordinary man on the street and development of better infrastructure for rural areas remain the issues at hand. 

While the opposition had a good chance of giving GPS a run for its money, had the election been called when Pakatan Harapan (PH) was in power at the Federal level, it would be another uphill battle to wrestle the state.

The opposition has yet to work out the seat allocation between them to avoid contesting against each other. Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) Sarawak has issued an ultimatum to Parti Sarawak Bersatu (PSB) that a deal must be reached by the end of the month. PKR had lost some seats when some assemblymen left the party when the PH government collapsed and has targeted to win six to seven seats at the next election.

PKR state chairman Larry Sng has indicated that the party is willing to negotiate half of their seats identified to be contested in the coming election in the interest of the PH coalition. 

However, it is unacceptable for us to give away seats which the party had previously won, particularly Batu Lintang and Ba Kelalan,” Sng said. Both the assemblymen for the two seats, See Chee How and Baru Bian, quit PKR in 2020 and have since joined PSB. 

PH Sarawak and DAP Sarawak chairman Chong Chieng Jen said the opposition coalition is willing to negotiate with PSB for the next state election with a ‘3+3+3+1’ formula on the seat allocation between political parties where DAP, PKR and PSB each contest 30 per cent of the constituency seats in the state election, while Parti Amanah Negara (Amanah) would be contesting the remaining 10 per cent of the seats.

As to whether the opposition can retain or increase their current 14 seats in the state assembly, the key lies in striking a deal that would avoid contesting each other.

As for GPS, it is set to retain control of the state once more.

By the PolTracker team, 4 Feb 2021

Second Time's the Charm: Malaysia and the State of Emergency

Compiled by Poltracker

Compiled by Poltracker

Just 13 days into 2021, the country’s political climate remains turbulent with removal and growing calls for a snap poll from Umno despite the raging Covid-19 pandemic. 

To make things even more interesting, a state of Emergency on 12 January to combat the pandemic. This has resulted in the suspension of Parliament and state assemblies. It will keep things on simmer for now and put an end to any talks of an immediate general election.

Umno delivered a surprise on 5 January when Federal Territories Minister Tan Sri Annuar Musa was removed as secretary-general for Barisan Nasional (BN). Annuar’s ‘crime’ was alleged to be the voice of Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia (Bersatu) in BN.

Days after the removal, Annuar had slammed those in his party for calling for a snap election amid the Covid-19 pandemic.

“Urging for elections when the people and the country are struggling with Covid-19, floods, the economy, clearly reflects not only the irresponsibility, but also the hunger for power and the lack of sensitivity to the people’s suffering. That is not the will of the grassroots,” said the Ketereh MP in his Twitter account.

His comment echoed Umno minister and Rembau MP Khairy Jamaluddin who said any section of Malaysia seeking a general election alongside the Covid-19 pandemic was “selfish” and “irresponsible”, and acknowledged that the group included those from his party.

Umno has been pushing for snap poll for the past few months in both subtle and not so subtle manner. In October last year, it had threatened to pull out of the PN coalition and more recently Umno president Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi had said elections could be held with Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) in place.

"Why are we afraid of holding a general election during the pandemic? More than 30 countries have already done so… Why is Malaysia is so afraid? I think that we're not really scared of Covid-19 but of other things," he said in his opening speech at the Bagan Datuk Umno division meeting on 3 January.

While Annuar has remained supportive of the Perikatan Nasional (PN) government, his fellow MPs Datuk Seri Mohamed Nazri Abdul Aziz of Padang Rengas and Machang MP Datuk Ahmad Jazlan Yaakob have withdrawn their support

Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin's government is now left with 109 MPs on its bloc out the current 220 MPs. The Dewan Rakyat is comprised of 222 seats but is currently down to 220 following the deaths of Batu Sapi MP Datuk Liew Vui Keong and Gerik MP Datuk Hasbullah Osman last year.

At 109, the PN government does not have the simple majority support of the Dewan Rakyat.

Umno was scheduled to discuss its ties with Bersatu at its General Assembly at the end of this month but that will put on hold as Kuala Lumpur has been put on MCO until 26 January with probable extension due to the rising number of positive Covid-19 cases.

It is obvious that UMNO is the key component to keeping Muhyiddin’s coalition alive. PN’s government’s legitimacy has been questioned since the Sheraton move last February. More withdrawal of support from UMNO’s MPs will make the government untenable, Emergency or not.

The only thing that remains in Muhyiddin’s favour is the challenge for the opposing MPs to hammer a coalition to form a government until such time it is safe to go to the polls.

By Sharon TAN, KHOR Yu Leng, and the PolTracker team, 18 Jan 2021

Editor’s note on the data chart:

  • Following the Emergency announcement, the government regulatory body, Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC), warned netizens to “be polite and courteous” [jaga kesopanan dan kesusilaan: this seems to be taken straight from the Rukun Negara (Malay for the Malaysian declaration of national philosophy), which is generally recited weekly by school students] when expressing opinions online. This carefully worded warning somehow led to Twitter users exposing MCMC past off-colour Tweets, which turned out to be from a previous user from whom they bought their account in an apparent violation of Twitter’s terms and conditions.

  • Twitter sentiments on the YDPA appear caught up in problems that users are highlighting for the YDPA’s attention, e.g. complaints about politicians, suggestions to cut their salaries. This means Tweets tagged as a negative sentiment are not actually about the YDPA; it is the issues netizens are urging him to address which are negative. In general, sentiments towards the YDPA are much more favourable compared to sentiments on politicians.

Money, Money, Money: The 2021 Budget

Compiled by PolTracker

Compiled by PolTracker

Nadirah

Just last week, the Muhyddin administration presented their budget for 2021. Interestingly, Twitterjaya mentions and sentiment appeared less than thrilled, with Tengku Zafrul Aziz, the current Finance Minister, receiving quite a brunt of Malaysian Twitter netizens displeasure.

While criticism of government budgets is a traditional annual event, the air about it feels different for 2020. This year, public disapproval—at least the ones online—seems more visceral than usual, aggravated by the rakyat’s already building frustration due to the coronavirus pandemic as well as the continuous gaffes by the government in response to the recent wave of Covid-19 cases. Public trust in politicians on both divides is tanking, and after the Budget voting fiasco, it’s anyone’s guess how that trust is going to be rebuilt (if it was even there to begin with).

Yu Leng
The Muhyiddin administration is relatively safe until the final budget vote (3rd reading) on 17th December. It won this first hurdle by a walk over! It means that the opposition does not have the strength to topple it. There has been so much chatter in Kuala Lumpur about ruling coalition factions sitting out and even about opposition factions negotiating deals for a unity approach. But the Prime Minister is all powerful in Malaysia’s winner-takes-all political economy.

The “voice vote” and the inexplicable no-vote-silence of major parts of the opposition came as a big surprise yesterday.  Let’s not forget that the underlying mood in Malaysia appears rather negative despite this being seen as a pro-Bumiputera budget. Looking beyond the intellectual chat groups, I was surprised to see how negative is sentiment in Twitter on belanjawan (budget in Malay) and regarding the Minister of Finance. This is another (wider) bubble of opinion but the deteriorating sentiment since the Budget Speech on 6 November is still notable. 

Trumpian politics does point to the big weight of the rural vote while urbanites may be left to whinge on. Those relying on urban votes may feel they sit strong in their niches too. But politicians across the spectrum should not forget there is deep suspicion that double standards (for their benefit) has taken Malaysia from a stellar position in Covid-19-economic mitigation to a plummeting situation; on the back of the free-and-easy approach they all took in the Sabah election in recent months. The obvious Covid-19 SOP exemptions they enjoy are also splashed across social media. The strong wave of Covid-19 cases post-Sabah and the movement restrictions have pulled the rug out from under the rakyat’s feet yet again. Belanjawan/Budget 2021 has to spend wisely to mend all this.

This unprecedentedly awkward budget process will increase distrust in politicians. All politicians will be answering tough questions. The opposition on why so many did not push for a formal count? The PN-BN group about accountability and oversight of Budget spending; to address Malaysia’s chronic untargeted spending problem. The country has been running budget deficits since the Asian Financial Crisis in the late 1990s and even the short-lived Pakatan Harapan administration had a bigger Budget than the Najib administration, and on and on it goes.

Sharon

Instead of allowing people to access their EPF savings, the government should have worked with the banks for an extension of the moratorium for loans. The government as regulators has the ability to make the banks toe the line while the banks are able to withstand the deferred service of loans. Technically, the banks’ are not registering losses but merely deferring profits. A moratorium on the loans would give individuals and businesses a lot of breathing space as they navigate through this difficult climate. As it is many have lost jobs and businesses shuttered, the moratorium would prevent a whole lot of NPLs.

Another case against the EPF withdrawal is RM10,000 would not go very far for most people. Whether it is a one off withdrawal or in 12 instalments, it will not be able to tide much more than three months. What happens after that? As it stands, Malaysians don’t have enough savings in EPF for their retirement. Taking out RM10,000 is a big sum for the lower income earners and would seriously affect their retirement fund.

A Game of Thrones: US Post Elections, 17 Nov 2020

The 2020 US elections are finally over, although the horizon seems to promise yet more drama up until Joe Biden’s inauguration early next year. As the world settles into the results, here are some thoughts from our PolTracker team members.

Sharon

The Democrats received 306 votes in the Electoral College. Joe Biden will be the 46th President of the United States of America come 20 January 2021. In over a week since Biden exceeded the 270 threshold requirement to win, Donald Trump has yet to formally concede and he has repeatedly claimed victory via tweets. Trump had also launched a series of lawsuits based on allegations of election fraud. Most courts have thrown out these lawsuits due to lack of evidence. In any case, any recounts or legal challenges are not expected to overturn the overall result. Biden has also the lead in the popular vote that has surpassed five million.

The Republican representatives are divided on the results with some encouraging Trump to continue his challenge while some have openly congratulated Biden on his win.

The problem now lies with the transition, which is crucial for the Biden’s incoming administration to get up to speed on the country’s state of affairs. With Trump’s refusal to concede (which is not required by law but a matter of convention), the normal handover process to the new government has been stalled.

The General Services Administration (GSA), the government agency tasked with beginning the process and is headed by a Trump appointee, has yet to recognise Biden and his running mate Kamala Harris as winners. Hence, the Biden team has not been given access to classified security briefings, federal agencies and funding needed for a smooth transition of power. Despite the roadblocks, Biden has appointed his Chief of Staff and has also assembled a COVID-19 task force to tackle the pandemic.

The electors in the Electoral College are scheduled to meet in the respective states to cast ballots on Dec 14. Once the votes are counted, the electors all sign six certificates of the results. Perhaps then, Trump would have no choice but to face the stark reality that he has lost his presidency.

Nadirah

Compiled by PolTracker

Compiled by PolTracker

Biden claimed victory on 8 November 2020, about four days after the polling day, with Trump still struggling to (formally) concede defeat. Twitter mentions and sentiment (global) leading up to this show Biden overtaking Trump on both fronts, i.e. Biden received a higher number of mentions which recorded more positive sentiment than his Republican counterpart.

Interestingly, while some Trump voters are seen as racist and the misinformed, the large number of Trump voters is turning discussions to what drives so many Trump voters. One article points out that within the context of an unchanging flawed democratic system, a rationale surfaces: a voter attempts to maximise whatever little stake they have in it. In other words, voters cast their ballots for Trump, “fully cognisant of all his flaws, shortcomings and dangers” and in search of tax breaks and more.

In this article, correspondent Nesrine Malik classified seven types of rational Trump voters. Several notable ones include: 1) high earners, i.e. the top 20%, who obtained a 3% gain in income; 2) entrepreneurs, with a survey revealing that 65% of respondents believed that Trump’s tax regime was the “best thing the government did for companies last year”, and; 3) lower end-workers—in some sectors, such as the shale and gas industry, job creation was directly attributed to Trump thanks to his vocal support. 

While many are unwilling to give Trump voters the time of day, being outright hostile might not be the right solution, no matter how cathartic of a solution that may be. As columnist Cathy Young explains, it only “perpetuate[s] the vicious cycle of demonization of which Trump has been both a cause and a symptom”. Trump voters (faith-driven, rational and other), will continue to exist in the Land of the Free—or anywhere else in the world, really—and continuously antagonising them may not be the best plan of action in the long run. 

Cyrene

The U.S Election 2020 saw former Vice President Joe Biden winning the presidency against Donald Trump (306 - 232) , the first President to lose a re-election bid since George H.W. Bush in 1992.   

Which groups favored Joe Biden or Donald Trump, by gender and race? Based on preliminary exit poll data (updated for 11 November 2020), Biden secured more women votes - by an small (improved) margin of two percentage points, ahead of Hilary Clinton (Note: In 2016, she received one of the “lowest shares of female votes of any Democrat”). This seems a lacklustre improvement in light of who he was running against; and given his (minority) female running mate - Kamala Harris.

A look at the background details of for-Biden (Democrat) women voters revealed that support had slipped among women of color (versus the 2016 election). The Biden Agenda for women has focused on inclusion and equality for women, and especially women of color, in issues like healthcare, economy, education, and national security to ensure that they can exercise their civil rights amidst a pandemic. Therefore, it does come as a surprise when Joe Biden underperforms Hilary Clinton with this group.

Donald Trump on the other hand saw an increase in support from white women (plus two percentage points compared to 2016), despite his rhetorical remarks about women. Alas, for The Donald, he lost support among white men (minus eight percentage points). What went wrong?

Yu Leng

Post US election, there was a mighty relief from the internationalised American (and others!) with whom I’m in touch with via social media. One wrote to me about the urban-rural divide: We can have a situation where Biden has now crossed the 5 million vote lead mark and yet folks doubt the result. Clinton had almost 3 million more votes than Trump and yet the electoral college handed it to the loser of the popular vote. Don't like it.

What caught my eye? 

First, yes, city votes matter less. The #LandDoesntVote graphic below, says much about how the electoral system distributes power. It empowers rural votes, much to the frustration of city voters. What’s going on? Have so-called anti-democratic institutions stacked the political systems against urban voters? This is a problem across many other democracies, with the finger often pointed to associations with the first past the post or "winner takes all" British-style electoral system. This delivered a shock of ex-London (well, the London-Oxford-Cambridge triangle) Brexiteers to its own mega city folk on 23 June 2016; and a few months later came Trumps’ 8 November 2016 victory.

Second, voting outcomes. The tendencies and shifts (I’ve started to look at the Associated Press/AP’s VoteCast survey findings, a 3-6 November NPR summary, and The Financial Times’ findings of 8 November). Interestingly, American voters who care most about economic concerns voted Trump, and those who cared about the virus (with huge acute economic concerns!) voted for Biden. Hmm. 

What will be done about the urban-rural divide and other underlying economic voting cleavages? Economists and policy makers have not cared enough about distributional impacts, and when will they start to? Economic inequality continues to be fertile ground for political meisters. Are both sides bamboozling voters?

Notable: Geographical polarisation & faith voting.

From the PolTracker team, 17 Nov 2020


DATA LINKS

A pro-exurban electoral system

What I’m earmarking for reading: 

Voting tendencies and trends

Understanding The 2020 Electorate: AP VoteCast Survey, 3 Nov 2020 (and since updated), by NPR

This data comes from AP VoteCast, a survey of the U.S. electorate conducted over several days before Nov. 3, continuing until the polls close. The data includes interviews with more than 110,000 people across the U.S. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 0.4 percentage points for voters. It is an alternative to traditional exit polls.

Note: EXTENSIVE VOTE DETAILS. Source: AP VoteCast, based on interviews with 110,485 likely voters and have been adjusted to reflect preliminary vote totals as of 10 a.m. ET on Nov. 6. The margin of error is 0.4 percentage points.

evangelical_Trump.jpg

Also, read our note on faith leaders and the Trump 2020 vote

AP VoteCast is a nationwide survey of more than 133,000 voters and nonvoters conducted for The Associated Press by NORC at the University of Chicago. Excerpts from, the article, AP VoteCast: Trump, Biden coalitions show race, class divide, 5 Nov 2020:

  • Despite a once-in-a-century pandemic and a weakened economy…. 76% of U.S. voters said they knew all along who they would support (the bulk of supporters for both presidential candidates)... two-thirds of all voters said their decision was about Trump — either for or against.

  • Biden amassed a sizable and diverse coalition of young, women, college-educated, urban and Black voters, groups that powered his party’s 2018 midterm victories. Some 38% of his support came from voters of color.

  • Trump, meanwhile, marshaled his overwhelmingly white and rural supporters to turn out voters in the places that anchored his victory four years ago. He held on to 62% of white voters without a college degree, despite Biden’s hopes of peeling off large numbers of them. And in some competitive states, like Nevada and Florida, Trump ate away at Biden’s support among Latinos.

  • Turnout for both parties appeared to be strong as voters expressed anxiety about the country’s future. Six in 10 voters — including most Biden voters and about a quarter of Trump voters — said the nation was on the wrong track.

  • Nearly three-quarters of U.S. voters were white and 55% of them backed Trump. The president secured 81% of white evangelical Christians. About half of men voted for him. Trump won 60% of voters living in small towns and rural areas.

  • Nationwide, nearly 57% of college graduates backed Biden. So did 55% of women. And 55% of voters under the age of 45. He won 65% of urban voters and 54% of suburbanites.

By numbers: how the US voted in 2020, 8 Nov 2020, Financial Times

From FT.com about the voter shifts 2016-2020

From FT.com about the voter shifts 2016-2020

From FT.com about political polarisation

From FT.com about political polarisation

Faith Leaders: Evangelicals, Trump, and the 2020 US Elections

One month Twitter mention for key faith leaders

One month Twitter mention for key faith leaders

Faith leaders and voters are storming heaven with prayers as the US presidential election remains inconclusive with several states having yet to tabulate all votes. Pro-Trump voters could be seen praying at counting stations while faith leaders have taken to social media to pray for results favouring incumbent Donald Trump and Mike Pence.

The Guardian writes: In 2016, white evangelicals made up a quarter of all US voters. And 81% of them voted for Donald Trump. Oliver Laughland and Tom Silverstone head to the pivotal battleground state of North Carolina to see if Trump's religious base is showing signs of crumbling. They meet extreme evangelical pastors, travelling progressive preachers and the moral movement leader Rev. William Barber.

Paula White-Cain who is Trump’s special advisor to the Faith and Opportunity Initiative at the Office of Public Liaison has been in the forefront leading prayers for the president. Most recent on Wednesday night, White-Cain called upon ‘angelic reinforcement’ from continents of Africa and South America.

“I hear a sound of victory, the Lord says it is done. For angels have been dispatched from Africa right now… In the name of Jesus from South America, they are coming here,” she said in a video that has since gone viral (see her Twitter mentions shoot up, in our graph above).

The televangelist from Florida was also heard saying that demonic confederacies are attempting to steal the election from Trump. White-Cain, who preaches prosperity theology, was heard speaking in tongues, an occurrence where the speaker speaks in an unknown language during an intense prayer session.

Who’s big on Facebook? Major Trump-associated and/or supporting faith leaders and related pages are shown immediately below. Next is the Facebook posting of Pastor Darrel Scott for a White House invite, and Tweet of an early October prayer session (looks to be in the White House).

From the PolTracker team, 6 Nov 2020

Key faith leaders for Trump

Key faith leaders for Trump

From Facebook of Pastor Darrel Scott

From Facebook of Pastor Darrel Scott

Bruce LeVell Tweet, @Bruce_LeVell Longtime President Donald J Trump Advisor, Senior RNC Media Surrogate……

Bruce LeVell Tweet, @Bruce_LeVell Longtime President Donald J Trump Advisor, Senior RNC Media Surrogate……